Oops. Tomcat twice the speed of WebSphere.
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 20 November 2000 15:42
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Antwort: RE: tomcat vs orion vs weblogic testing results (Load
Runner)
Hi,
which one is faster, Tomcat or Websphere?
Thomas
David Oxley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> am 20.11.2000 15:15:02
Bitte antworten an [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Kopie:
Thema: RE: tomcat vs orion vs weblogic testing results (Load Runner)
Are there any benchmarks between Tomcat and WebSphere because at our site
we
are seeing Tomcat is twice the speed of Tomcat and I'm sure this can't be
right!!
Dave
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----Original Message-----
From: Amrhein, Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 20 November 2000 11:38
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: AW: tomcat vs orion vs weblogic testing results (Load Runner)
Which JVM did you use?
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Manne Anliot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet am: Montag, 20. November 2000 11:15
An: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Betreff: tomcat vs orion vs weblogic testing results (Load Runner)
Hi all..
I'm doing work load testing on a webapplication built on javascript, .JSP:s
and EJB:s. We've load tested on many different setups and are getting some
interesting results:
Simulated number of users: 25
Computer setup: NT4 sp6, 1 GB RAM, Pentium III ~600 MHz
Tomcat setup: 1 ajp12-worker.. (We need out-of-process workers for
scalability)
<snip>
setup1: webserver - apache 1.3.x, jsp - tomcat 3.2b6 (mod_jk.dll)
setup2: webserver - weblogic, jsp - weblogic (latest versions as of this
date)
setup3: webserver - orion, jsp - orion (latest versions as of this date)
<snip>
setup2 and setup3 are 8 (eight) times faster in our tests (Load Runner).
Even if we suspected tomcat to be a bit slower, this is truly remarkable..
We've tried optimizing Tomcat by:
1. using ajp13 protocol - failed, we're just getting exceptions from tomcat
2. reloadable=false - of course
3. fiddling with JVM memory settings - minor improvements
Any ideas on what's wrong here? This must be a configuration problem. Have
anyone else found the same results?
Regards,
Manne Anliot.
