I would say the best and cleanest way would be to have the page start with
<%@page contentType="text/vnd.wap.wml"%><?xml version="1.0"?>
I think this should work in Tomcat 4 (if not, I would consider it a bug in
TC4).
Petr
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scott Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2000 5:37 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Alex Tang
> Subject: Re: WML Generation from JSP broken!!!!
>
>
> Could you not just replace your <?xml version="1.0"?> with
> <% out.println("<?xml version=\"1.0\"?>"); %> ?
>
> Seems like that would work to me...
>
> Cheers,
>
> -Scott
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Alex Tang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Alex Tang"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2000 5:50 PM
> Subject: Re: WML Generation from JSP broken!!!!
>
>
> > Is there a way to get the compiler to ignore the "<?xml
> version="1.0"?>"
> syntax?
> >
> > Otherwise this means that serving any page that is XML
> compliant (WML,
> XHTML, etc) now requires a complete
> > rewrite of all JSP files to run in 4.0.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > ...alex...
> >
> >
> > "Craig R. McClanahan" wrote:
> >
> > > Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > > Attached is a JSP Sample file which generates WML. It
> works with no
> problems on Tomcat3.1, but
> > > > fails miserably with the latest dev nightly snapshot and m4. Can
> someone shed light?
> > > >
> > >
> > > Well, your page certainly doesn't work under Tomcat 4.0 (which
> implements JSP 1.2). Furthermore, it
> > > *should* not.
> > >
> > > Because you are starting this page with an <?xml version="1.0"?>
> directive, the JSP compiler assumes that
> > > you have created this page in the XML syntax for JSP
> pages, as described
> in the 1.2 spec
> > > <http://java.sun.com/products/jsp/download.html>.
> However, this page
> violates several of the rules:
> > > * It does not start with a <jsp:root> element (this is
> > > what the parse error is complaining about).
> > > * It uses <% %> for a scriptlet, instead of the
> > > required <jsp:scriptlet> element.
> > >
> > > You will need to rewrite your page conforming to the new
> syntax rules in
> order for it to work correctly
> > > under 4.0.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks in advance,
> > > > dims
> > > >
> > > > PS: Am not currently subscribed to the list. So please CC me at
> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> > > >
> > >
> > > Craig McClanahan
> > >
> > > PS: Why did it work under 3.1? Because 3.1 didn't
> support the XML
> syntax, so it just passed the <?xml?>
> > > directive through as template text.
> >
> >
>
