We are using JTurbo with our Cofax content management system delivering 17
newspapers to the net, amoungst which is the Philadelphia Inquirer and
Tallahasse Democrat.
-Karl
> -----Original Message-----
> From: G.Nagarajan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2000 12:30 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Linux->NT->MSsqlServer
>
>
> Yes, the atinav driver forces you to use a single statement
> throughout a
> transaction.
> And in the freeTDS driver, the transaction is connected with
> the statement.
>
> How about these type 3 drivers from Merant and others. Has
> anyone worked
> with them?
> I did not try them for two reasons. Adding another
> intermediate layer and
> making
> things complicated and to avoid one more source of possible errors.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matt Goss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2000 6:11 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: linux->NT->MSsqlServer
>
>
> Ditto...
> I'm also using the JTurbo 2.0 JDBC driver, and on benchmark
> tests against
> Bea's
> Weblogic JDBC driver, it came up 5 times faster!
> Matt
>
> Eric Hartmann wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I've test two drivers JDBC for Microsoft SQL Server 7 /
> 2000. jdbcKona
> > driver from BEA (does not works with SQL 2000) and JTurbo
> from Ashna.
> JTurbo
> > 2.0 (www.jturbo.com) is a very good driver for SQL Server.
> It's fast and
> > reliable with my tests. I didn't test it on Linux but you
> can download a
> > test version for 30j and limited to 5 connections. It seems
> that JTurbo is
> > more reliable than jdbcKona. But this two level 4 drivers
> are good however
> > we choose JTurbo that seems to be faster.
> >
> > I hope this helps
> >
> > Eric
> >
>
