Do your own tests and see if Apache + Tomcat or just Tomcat fullfill your requirement. Tomcat 4.1.x in some case is as good as Apache/Tomcat.
-- Jeanfrancois
Florian Ebeling wrote:
Hi,
Apache is faster for static content and has shorter startup times. And HTTP implemenation is probably more mature in a pure HTTP server like apache.
Steve Jenkins wrote:
Hi,
Wonder if anyone can help. I keep reading that one should not deploy TOMCAT on its' own on a live production server, that you should use Apache as the main webserver redirecting through to TOMCAT - but I don't find anywhere that says why.
Why shouldn't you put just TOMCAT on a live production server? Why should you use Apache & Tomcat?
Anyone help?
Many thanks, Steve.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]