Howdy, >Synchronizing the process method would be a bad idea (bottleneck for all >requests) so it looks like there won't be any choice but to recreate the RE >as local variables. There is also a possibility (ugly one) of serializing >the array of RE to a byte array and de-serializing it in the process >method. > >Thoughts?
We'll have to benchmark the recreation of REs as local variables to see the impact on performance. If it's not too bad, then that'll be the fix. Please open a bugzilla item for this with your observations from your original message and your fix idea above. Thanks, Yoav Shapira This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business communication, and may contain information that is confidential, proprietary and/or privileged. This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed, and may not be saved, copied, printed, disclosed or used by anyone else. If you are not the(an) intended recipient, please immediately delete this e-mail from your computer system and notify the sender. Thank you. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
