On Mon, 2004-02-09 at 17:37, David Rees wrote: > On Mon, February 9, 2004 at 4:41 pm, Charles Daniel wrote: > > > > Give up trying to use Apache2 with mod_jk. After spending days on the > > message boards trying to solve this one, I was ultimately told by the > > so-called "experts" that "I had a network configuration problem and that > > some process was likely to be either already using or blocking port 8009". > > Hmm, I've had no problems at all using mod_jk with Apache2 on both various > Linux and SGI Irix machines. I must be a so-called "expert". ;-) > > -Dave
if you've got a minute, take a look @ the configs I posted http://nicholasbernstein.com/tomcat/ and let me know if you see anything wrong with the setup. I'd rather stick to apache2; i'm using redhat ES and it looks like they've made a lot of RH specific patches to httpd source, so it probably performs a lot better that compiling 1.x from source. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- +---------------------------------------------------------------+ | Nicholas Bernstein | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | UNIX Systems Administrator | http://www.docmagic.com | | Document Systems Inc. | | | gpg: F706 8C4E 78FA DDDD 53A0 019F D983 FE28 2002 D1F3 | +---------------------------------------------------------------+
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
