I have the same problem and I am considering modifying jk2 to support such a feature. Hopefully I will have some time in the next couple of weeks to try this out.
I need Apache for other apps too, not just tomcat. Charlie > -----Original Message----- > From: James Sherwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2004 11:08 AM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: Re: Serving up static content through apache using mod_jk > > Yes but in my case I have a ton of directories that are dynamically changed > so I want everything served through tomcat except some static stuff in one > directory:) > > Any ideas? > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "QM" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2004 11:50 AM > Subject: Re: Serving up static content through apache using mod_jk > > > > On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 11:52:11AM -0300, James Sherwood wrote: > > : If the JKMount /* ajp13 passes everything to the jk handler, is there a > way > > : route everything > > : but /staticserve directory to the jk handler? > > > > I've never done that, so I wouldn't know. > > > > I prefer the opposite approach: have a handful of JkMount directives, > > one for each Tomcat-served URI or file extension: > > > > JkMount /*.jsp > > JkMount /*.do > > JkMount /special/* > > JkMount /j_security_check > > > > -QM > > > > -- > > > > software -- http://www.brandxdev.net > > tech news -- http://www.RoarNetworX.com > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
