what type of problems does 2.0.51 have?? On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Kyle Adams wrote:
> Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 13:50:49 -0400 > From: Kyle Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: jk2 over non-default port > > Ding ding ding! That was the ticket! > > Port 32767 works fine. Port 32768, and channelSocket.open() reverts > back to using the default 8009. Boy, I hope others with high port > number find this thread, because it'll save them quite a bit of time. > > BTW, thanks for the heads up on 2.0.51 having problems. I'll have to > recompile with the patch provided on the Apache site. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
