I second this.

I've had nothing but trouble out of JK2, configuration difficulties on Apache and just 
flatly broken on IIS.

The original JK adapter has worked great.

-Brantley

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nicolas Mailhot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2004 7:59 AM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: Tomcat 5/Apache 2/JK2- production quality?
> 
> Le mercredi 29 septembre 2004 à 12:43 -0400, Kurt Overberg a écrit :
> > Gang,
> >
> > I've been running a fairly large website (25000 pages/day) off of
> > Tomcat4.1.30/JK/Apache1.3 for quite some time now.  Its been running
> great, but
> > in expectation of needing some load balancing, I'm thinking of moving to
> > Tomcat5/Apache2/JK2.  Anyone have any thoughts or experiences with
> running these
> > versions in a production environment?  Thanks!
> 
> Henri Gomez stated yesterday on JPackage lists JK2 was not ready for
> production and there would be a new integrated connector module in
> apache 2.1 anyway. He got as far as to suggest we remove our JK2
> package.
> 
> Now since he's heavily involved with JK1 you might want to take his
> words with a grain of salt, but I personnally won't discount them (of
> course, the hellish config system of JK2 helps a lot to make one's
> mind). You'll notice even in the official JK2 doc pages there is no
> clear endorsement of JK2 over JK1, and in fact large parts of it deal
> only with JK1.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> --
> Nicolas Mailhot


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to