I second this. I've had nothing but trouble out of JK2, configuration difficulties on Apache and just flatly broken on IIS.
The original JK adapter has worked great. -Brantley > -----Original Message----- > From: Nicolas Mailhot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2004 7:59 AM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: Re: Tomcat 5/Apache 2/JK2- production quality? > > Le mercredi 29 septembre 2004 à 12:43 -0400, Kurt Overberg a écrit : > > Gang, > > > > I've been running a fairly large website (25000 pages/day) off of > > Tomcat4.1.30/JK/Apache1.3 for quite some time now. Its been running > great, but > > in expectation of needing some load balancing, I'm thinking of moving to > > Tomcat5/Apache2/JK2. Anyone have any thoughts or experiences with > running these > > versions in a production environment? Thanks! > > Henri Gomez stated yesterday on JPackage lists JK2 was not ready for > production and there would be a new integrated connector module in > apache 2.1 anyway. He got as far as to suggest we remove our JK2 > package. > > Now since he's heavily involved with JK1 you might want to take his > words with a grain of salt, but I personnally won't discount them (of > course, the hellish config system of JK2 helps a lot to make one's > mind). You'll notice even in the official JK2 doc pages there is no > clear endorsement of JK2 over JK1, and in fact large parts of it deal > only with JK1. > > Regards, > > -- > Nicolas Mailhot --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
