> > Sounds like NAV may have returned some false > > positives. The only > > "virus-like" content I would expect inside a plain > > HTML doc would be > > rogue JavaScript. > > Indeed. I looked at the HTML page myself - it's > unaltered, and there's nothing rogue in there that I > can see.
Links with strange urls? > > Perhaps you could point your admin to the web > > resources you found, those > > concerning false positives from NAV? > > I agree - I already sent the link yesterday afternoon. > > > This could become a sticky issue of corporate > > politics, depending on > > your organization's structure. You may have to get > > your management to > > talk to the admin's management. > > > > -QM > > You're right on there. This could be very sticky and > uncomfortable. I'm not sure how receptive corp will > be. > > Thanks - MOD For a little smoke screen, you might even mention the recent jpeg vulnerabilities and the issues Norton seems to be having seeing those. Might even create enough reverse heat to motivate a move to *nix. -- Joel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
