This is my workers2.properties (not workers.properties). You don't need to touch jk2.properties or httpd.conf.
# shared memory handling. [shm] file=C:\Program Files\Apache Group\Tomcat 4.1\work\jk2.shm size=1048576 # Defines a load balancer named lb. Use even if you only have one machine. #[lb:lb] # example socket channel, explicitly set port and host [channel.socket:localhost:8009] #tomcatId=localhost:8009 port=8009 host=127.0.0.1 tomcatId=jvm1 # define the worker [ajp13:localhost:8009] channel=channel.socket:localhost:8009 #group=lb # uri mapping #[uri:/examples/*] #group=lb [uri:investments.localhost/lciponline/*] #group=lb [uri:test.localhost/onlinestore/*] #group=lb #[uri:/investments/*] #group=lb # ROOT [uri:investments.localhost/*] [uri:test.localhost/*] [uri:investments.localhost/manager/*] #group=lb [uri:test.localhost/manager/*] [uri:investments.localhost/admin/*] [uri:test.localhost/admin/*] [status:] info=Status worker, displays runtime information [uri:investments.localhost/jkstatus/*] #worker=status:status group=status: [uri:test.localhost/jkstatus/*] #worker=status:status group=status: -----Original Message----- From: Allen Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: October 27, 2004 9:03 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Apache, Tomcat and mod_jk2 - question about layout Second request: Would you post what you did to integrate the two? I've followed all the "clues" on both apache and tomcat websites, which is exactly what it says in three books I've got, and I still get a "File Not Found" error from apache when I go to the dynamic content. Is there some reference and description of the parameters and values for the workers.properties, jk2.properties, and httpd.conf files? Although the Jakarta website has some of this, the examples showing the parameters being used are pretty sparse. What does JkMount do? I can't find this documented anywhere. I assure you, I've spent DAYS on the websites, in the books, and looking for documentation whereever I can find it. Thanks, Allen > -----Original Message----- > From: footh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 10:08 PM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: Re: Apache, Tomcat and mod_jk2 - question about layout > > > Thanks for the tips. I believe the site will be using > SSL at some point so that may be a reason to use > Apache. But for the time being, I suppose I might as > well use Tomcat standalone knowing that I can just > "flip a switch" (well, a couple switches) to get > Apache back in there. > > > --- Peter Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I am using Apache2, jk2 and Tomcat5 but I do so > > because I want to > > offload the SSL and compression onto a first tier > > leaving the second > > just to generate the content. I also use the first > > tier for uri > > rewriting using mod_rewrite. > > > > If you don't need uri rewriting I would consider > > using Tomcat standalone > > as the performance is likely to be comparable but > > the reduced admin by > > removing Apache and jk would be a big benefit. Why > > have more steps that > > can go wrong? More to debug when it does? > > > > To answer the questions from your first email. The > > images will be being > > returned from Apache, remember that an image is a > > separate request. I > > will qualify this by stating that any dynamically > > generated images will > > be returned by Tomcat. > > > > Regarding the directory setup ... it is whatever > > works best for you. I > > personally do the following: > > Apache Content -> /sites/static/<site name>/....... > > Tomcat Content -> /sites/webapps/<site name>/.... > > > > This means that all of the Tomcat content is outside > > the realm of Apache > > and thus security concerns are reduced. > > > > my 2c, > > > > PJ > > > > footh wrote: > > > > >I've read the FAQ on the topic of whether to go > > >through Apache or just use Tomcat stand-alone and > > >frankly, it seemed inconclusive. Then I did a > > search > > >and it seemed the general consensus was to use > > Tomcat > > >stand-alone for development enviroments and Apache > > for > > >production. > > > > > >Really, that's all I went by. I figured using > > Apache, > > >Tomcat and mod_jk was the more robust solution and > > >better suited for the long haul. More and more > > >features will likely be added to this site so I > > need > > >to be forward thinking. > > > > > >--- Parsons Technical Services <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > >>Unless you have a reason, why not let Tomcat do it > > >>all? > > >> > > >>Doug > > >> > > >>----- Original Message ----- > > >>From: "footh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >>Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 5:13 PM > > >>Subject: Apache, Tomcat and mod_jk2 - question > > about > > >>layout > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>>After going through all the documentation, I have > > >>>gotten mod_jk2 to forward jsp requests to Tomcat. > > > > >>>However, I have a question about the layout... > > >>> > > >>>Essentially, my site will be .html pages with > > some > > >>>occasional .jsp pages (it will likely change in > > >>> > > >>> > > >>the > > >> > > >> > > >>>future to all .jsp/servlets, but for now that's > > >>> > > >>> > > >>the > > >> > > >> > > >>>way it is). Right now, I have the Apache > > >>> > > >>> > > >>DocumentRoot > > >> > > >> > > >>>pointing to the directory containing the site and > > >>> > > >>> > > >>also > > >> > > >> > > >>>I have a Tomcat Context with a blank path > > property > > >>> > > >>> > > >>and > > >> > > >> > > >>>docBase property pointing to the same site > > >>> > > >>> > > >>directory. > > >> > > >> > > >>>So, basically, I can browse the site by going to > > >>>http://localhost:8080 using Tomcat in addition to > > >>> > > >>> > > >>the > > >> > > >> > > >>>standard http://localhost address (through > > >>> > > >>> > > >>Apache). > > >> > > >> > > >>>And, with mod_jk2 working, I can also hit > > >>>http://localhost/xyz.jsp and have a .jsp page > > >>> > > >>> > > >>execute > > >> > > >> > > >>>correctly. > > >>> > > >>>So, my question is, is this the correct way to > > >>>configure this kind of web site? When .jsp pages > > >>> > > >>> > > >>are > > >> > > >> > > >>>hit, are the images actually being loaded by > > >>> > > >>> > > >>Apache or > > >> > > >> > > >>>by Tomcat? > > >>> > > >>>A problem I've discovered is that if I need to > > use > > >>> > > >>> > > >>a > > >> > > >> > > >>>web.xml file in the WEB-INF directory, I can > > >>> > > >>> > > >>actually > > >> > > >> > > >>>browse to the WEB-INF directory when hitting the > > >>> > > >>> > > >>site > > >> > > >> > > >>>through port 80 (Apache). Obviously, this is not > > >>> > > >>> > > >>a > > >> > > >> > > >>>good idea so I am thinking there is probably a > > >>> > > >>> > > >>better > > >> > > >> > > >>>way to set this site up. Any ideas? > > >>> > > >>>Thanks, > > >>> > > >>>JF > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > > === message truncated === > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] !DSPAM:417f9c45155311021598181!
