On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 08:52:00 +0100, Michael Sudkamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And we switched from FreeTDS (which AFAIK is the predecessor of jTDS) to the > MS driver years ago because is had more functionality. We use it with heavy > statements and result sets and had never any problem with it ;-) > > Michael
"Years" in real life does a few thousand years in Internet time. :-) I suggest giving a shot to one of the latest releases of jtds.. It is quite *solid* and *performant*. Btw, we use FreeTDS for a legacy system on UNIX to connect it to an SQL Server and it seems to work nice too. I don't know older releases though.. /tb. > > > -----Ursprungliche Nachricht----- > > Von: Tuncay Baskan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 10. November 2004 00:30 > > An: Tomcat Users List > > Betreff: Re: comparison of Type 4 JDBC drivers > > > > > > On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 12:18:20 +1300, Craig Collings > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Interesting. > > > > > > I'm using com.microsoft.jdbc.sqlserver.SQLServerDriver > > which is a type 4 > > > driver and I am also getting ex VM errors: > > > > > > any ideas? > > > > I don't know if it's helps.. We tried to use Microsoft JDBC drivers in > > our applications but because of its troubles we decided to use jTds, > > which is a but rock-solid free driver.. > > > > You can get it from http://jtds.sourceforge.net/. > > > > -- > > /tb. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- /tb. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
