Hi Guys,

Bit the bullet and have switched our intranet test server over to JDK 5 / 
Tomcat 5.5.4 Stable. 

Anyway, I've hit a small hurdle and believe it or not it is not JNDI data 
sources .. that stuff worked perfectly!

No, it's the other one .. logging. I am not quite getting where the old style 
Logger localhost_log logging is being directed, you know the JSP error stack 
traces and all the other nice runtime exception logging.

Now, I know Logger has been removed from 5.5 series and that we are supposed to 
be using some kind of log4j / commons-logging stylee way but am fairly 
surprised that 5.5.4 did not come with a basic setup for this. 

Anyway, found the tomcat logging FAQ which explains to use commons-logging and 
so on, and the links that point to some past posts, but the posts talk about 
tomcat 4 and the old log4j category configuration. We're also directed over to 
commons-logging but that documentation is not great.

I have tried what I believed to be how to do this, e.g I placed a basic console 
appender log4j.properties file into tomcat/common/classes and popped log4j1.2.8 
into the common/lib. No logging though.

My webapp's log4j logging is all working perfectly well, but I am after the old 
localhost_log debug logging. Maybe I am missing something but that was our 
numero uno way of determining what problems were happening during development, 
but now it's gone.

Can anyone offer a water-tight configuration with 5.5.4 to get this logging 
back?

Eternally grateful, Allistair.

PS: Got my copy of Halo 2 x)


<FONT SIZE=1 FACE="VERDANA,ARIAL" COLOR=BLUE> 
-------------------------------------------------------
QAS Ltd.
Developers of QuickAddress Software
<a href="http://www.qas.com";>www.qas.com</a>
Registered in England: No 2582055
Registered in Australia: No 082 851 474
-------------------------------------------------------
</FONT>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to