and you'll also have to factor in a little re-configuration too, for example the much-debated logging (i.e Logger removal in 5.5), and also a slightly different JNDI datasource setup. if it's any interest to you we've had 5.5.4 (sensibly or not) running our production and dev servers for 2 weeks with only 1 issue which was related to a connector anyway I think.
Allistair. > -----Original Message----- > From: Tim Funk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 29 November 2004 16:39 > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: Re: Tomcat 5.0.x or 5.5.x in production > > > 5.5.5 is about to be tagged "soon." (See the dev list) > > If there are no showstoppers in that release - I (IMO) would say its > realistic to start consider moving your 5.0.X releases to > 5.5. But be warned > that if you have custom modules (valves, realms, etc) against > 5.0 - you will > need to recompile them (and of course test). > > -Tim > > David Boyer wrote: > > > We've been using Tomcat 5.0.x in production for the past > nine months or > > so. There appear to be numerous benefits to moving to 5.5.x, not the > > least of which being that it's the current focus of development. > > > > With 5.5.4 being labeled 'stable', I'm interested in moving > our sites > > to 5.5.x. > > > > Is 5.5.4 being regarded as being at least as stable/reliable as > > 5.0.28? > > > > Thanks! > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > <FONT SIZE=1 FACE="VERDANA,ARIAL" COLOR=BLUE> ------------------------------------------------------- QAS Ltd. Developers of QuickAddress Software <a href="http://www.qas.com";>www.qas.com</a> Registered in England: No 2582055 Registered in Australia: No 082 851 474 ------------------------------------------------------- </FONT> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
