Hi, >> From: Shapira, Yoav [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Tomcat is not deficient or lacking here in any way: if >> something is lacking, it's the Servlet Spec, but I personally >> don't think it's lacking because there's still a use-case for >> the no-filesystem servlet container. > >Hmm. Sorry, Yoav, but I think that's specious. There's still a >use-case for the motorcycle, but it doesn't invalidate the use-case for >the station wagon. Similarly, there is a use-case for the no-filesystem >servlet container, but I would argue that that is a special case >(possibly achieved via configuration) of a more general servlet >container.
I didn't say the no-filesystem container use-case pre-empts the one with filesystem. So specious is not a good word. But then again, I don't really care if you think it's specious or not, as I said, this is Spec-mandated and not Tomcat's call to make. Accordingly, any complaints of the "specious" and other type should be directed to the Servlet Expert Group. Yoav Shapira http://www.yoavshapira.com This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business communication, and may contain information that is confidential, proprietary and/or privileged. This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed, and may not be saved, copied, printed, disclosed or used by anyone else. If you are not the(an) intended recipient, please immediately delete this e-mail from your computer system and notify the sender. Thank you. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
