On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 17:03:19 -0700, Sean Dockery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/jk2/news/20041100.html#20041115.1 > > I had been under the impression that JK2 was superior to JK. In light > of the announcement, should we be sticking with JK from here-on-in?
Regardless of any new "superior" features in JK2, it's no longer under active development. ;) Ask yourself, "What do we do if we base our project on JK2, and we later encounter a bug? Who will fix it?" No one will force you to use JK instead of JK2; but unless you're prepared to maintain JK2 yourself, then it's better to follow the crowd and use JK. -QM -- software -- http://www.brandxdev.net tech news -- http://www.RoarNetworX.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
