Nope, new to the list -- never had any problems to speak of on *nix :-S
I think I'll go for option B.
Cheers
Richard Russell
Deutsche Bank AG London
Global Markets Customer Solutions
Office: +44 20 7545 8060
Mobile: +44 79 0661 2237
Andoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
02/10/2005 03:30 PM
Please respond to "Tomcat Users List"
To: Tomcat Users List <tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org>
cc:
Subject: Re: Apache/Win32 + mod_jk problem
Hi Richard,
If you have been reading this list for any period of time you may have
noticed that JK is more to do with Zen and Voodoo than real computer
science! It causes so many people heartache that it is unbelievable. The
only reason I knew the answer to your problem is because I have recently
had
the same problem myself.
While researching I was happy to hear that JK2 is being put out to pasture
because of a lack of interest. At least this makes one less decision for
the
likes of you and I to make when choosing a binary to download.
Basically my advice would be either:
Take it up as a hobby, sort it out, decompile it, write to the developers,
re-write the documentation, champion the cause and sort the whole thing
out
for everyone for once and for all... or:
Thank the Zen gods for getting it working for you and move rapidly along
to
your next job! ;-)
Can you guess which one I'd pick?
Later,
Andoni.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard Russell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.jakarta.tomcat.user
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 3:01 PM
Subject: Re: Apache/Win32 + mod_jk problem
> Thanks Andoni, that appeared to work.
>
> However, I don't really understand why.
>
> I had actually thought that this might be related to EAPI, which I
> understand is the primary difference (apart from mod_ssl itself) between
> Apache without SSL and Apache with SSL. However, I couldn't find any
> mention of this in the JK docs, nor in the Apache or Tomcat docs, and
> given that there was no option to download an EAPI/SSL Apache 1.3.33,
and
> no option to download a non-EAPI/SSL mod_jk 1.2.8, I presumed that they
> were compatible. Certainly more likely than this one, which is allegedly
> for Apache 1.3.31, and is an old version of mod_jk anyway.
>
> Does this mean that there is no binary Win32 Apache 1.3.33 and mod_jk
> 1.2.8 that can be downloaded that work with each other? This seems a
> little odd to me... Surely I'm missing something?
>
> Cheers
>
> Richard Russell
> Deutsche Bank AG London
> Global Markets Customer Solutions
> Office: +44 20 7545 8060
> Mobile: +44 79 0661 2237
>
>
>
>
> Andoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 02/10/2005 02:46 PM
> Please respond to "Tomcat Users List"
>
> To: Tomcat Users List <tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org>
> cc:
> Subject: Re: Apache/Win32 + mod_jk problem
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Try using the version of mod_jk.dll which you can find here:
>
>
http://www.apache.org/dist/jakarta/tomcat-connectors/jk/binaries/win32/jk-1.2.6/
>
> Called:
> mod_jk_1.2.6_1.3.31.dll
>
> Don't forget to change the line which refers to it in httpd.conf. Also
> don't
> forget to rename it to mod_jk.dll.
>
> I think the .so version is only for Apache with SSL built in.
>
> Andoni.
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Richard Russell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Newsgroups: gmane.comp.jakarta.tomcat.user
> Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 12:31 PM
> Subject: Apache/Win32 + mod_jk problem
>
>
> > I cannot run apache with mod_jk on Windows XP Pro + SP1. I have had no
> > troubles doing the same thing with multiple versions of Apache &
mod_jk
> on
> > multiple versions of Solaris, Linux and FreeBSD. This is, however, my
> > first attempt at mixing Windows with real software :-S
> >
> > I'm running the following versions:
> >
> > Apache 1.3.33 ${APACHE_MIRROR}/httpd/binaries/win32/
> > apache_1.3.33-win32-x86-no_src.exe
> > mod_jk 1.2.8
> > ${APACHE_MIRROR}/jakarta/tomcat-connectors/jk/binaries/win32/
> > mod_jk-1.2.8-apache-1.3.33-eapi.so
> >
> > MD5SUMs:
> > afb8924ec7b368e132fbed5f28ad6f3b apache_1.3.33-win32-x86-no_src.exe
> > ea33398544fe6ecdccecf81307c86211 mod_jk-1.2.8-apache-1.3.33-eapi.so
> >
> > The Apache one agrees with that listed on the website, but I can't
find
> an
> > md5sum listed for mod_jk...
> >
> > -----
> > C:\apache>apache
> > Syntax error on line 194 of c:/apache/conf/httpd.conf:
> > Cannot load c:/apache/modules/mod_jk.so into server: (127) The
specified
> > procedure could not be found:
> >
> > Note the errors or messages above, and press the <ESC> key to exit.
> 29...
> > C:\apache>grep -ni jk conf\httpd.conf
> > 194:LoadModule jk_module modules/mod_jk.so
> > 242:AddModule mod_jk.c
> > -----
> >
> > The mod_jk file has been renamed "mod_jk.so" and placed in the
> > "c:/apache/modules" directory. I have tried with it renamed as .dll
and
> it
> > makes no difference.
> >
> > I've also tried introducing intentional typos in the LoadModule
command
> > (eg LoadModule jk_module modules/mod_foojk.so), and found that this
> > changed the error message to something like "module not found", so
it's
> > definitely finding the module.
> >
> > I'm somewhat stuck here. The only documentation that mentions this
error
> > is for mod_ssl, and it suggests that I have an error in the AddModule
> > line... Which I don't think I do...
> >
> > Could someone advise?
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > Richard Russell
> > Deutsche Bank AG London
> > Global Markets Customer Solutions
> > Office: +44 20 7545 8060
> > Mobile: +44 79 0661 2237
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
