u r right, of course. It's just that weblogic generates the page OK for both
clients.

This is the code generated for firefox:

<EMBED type="application/x-java-applet" code="applet.MyApplet" codebase="."
align="top" archive="applet.jar" height="100" name="MyApplet"
width="100"></EMBED>

This works perfectly well. I've JRE1.4.1_03 installed.


-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Jost Richstein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 8. Juni 2005 09:49
An: Tomcat Users List
Betreff: Re: AW: Using appelts with different clients


Tomcat 5.5.9 generates the following code snippet, requesting version 1.2.2
of the plugin:

<OBJECT classid="clsid:8AD9C840-044E-11D1-B3E9-00805F499D93"
    width="100" height="100"
 
codebase="http://java.sun.com/products/plugin/1.2.2/jinstall-1_2_2-win.cab#V
ersion=1,2,2,0">
  <PARAM name="java_code" value="applet.MyApplet">
  <PARAM name="java_codebase" value=".">
  <PARAM name="type" value="application/x-java-applet;">

Firefox requires version 1.3.0_01 or better
(http://www.mozilla.org/support/firefox/faq#q2.2).
Maybe it's that version mismatch that leads to your problem?

And: could be a firefox issue as well.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Well, I discovered the following facts:
> 
> - I've created a jsp-page with the following line:
>   <jsp:plugin type="applet" code="applet.MyApplet" codebase="."
width="100"
> height="100"/>
> 
> - I've deployed all files to BEA weblogic. The page loades fine on IE and
> firefox.
> - I've deployed all files to tomcat. The page loads on IE, however, it
> doesn't on firefox. 
> 
> Therefore, I assume that this is either a bug, or tomcat just doesn't
> support different clients.
> 
> Heiner
> 
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Mark Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 7. Juni 2005 20:38
> An: Tomcat Users List
> Betreff: Re: Using appelts with different clients
> 
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
>>Other
>>servers create the corret page by using the jsp:pluggin tag. Tomcat
> 
> doesn't.
> 
> In what way does Tomcat not support this? As far as I am aware it does 
> in both 4.1.x and 5.5.x
> 
> Mark
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 
> 



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to