Thank you.
It's what I was thinking. So for a very little intranet or a little web
application, Tomcat is enought.
Thank you once more.
-----Message d'origine-----
De : Endre Stølsvik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Envoyé : mercredi 25 avril 2001 14:21
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Re: Tomcat as standalone HTTP server
On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, Olivier LAUDREN wrote:
| Hi,
|
| Is there somebody using Jakarta Tomcat as standalone HTTP server?
| Witch (is/are) the most important difference(s) between this
| configuration and Apache + Tomcat?
Speed on static documents. Apache is written in some C, while Tomcat is
written in the considerably slower Java.
Also you can load-balance via the apache, having one front-end apache
server, and 49 "backend" Tomcats. The apache can then do sticky session
load balancing between those tomcats.
It's a more messy config using both, but it works!
--
Mvh,
Endre
