On Mon, 24 Dec 2001 14:41:20 +0100 "Wouter Boers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That is not true. Then you have to pass the session cookie as a > parameter through URL rewriting. You see that quite often. But then > again, who does not accept cookies nowadays? Many people, including myself. The point is; you can never rely on cookies since it is an optional feature that can be enabled/disabled at will, even in the middle of a session. So anything you do w/ cookies should transparently fallback to URL-Rewriting whenever necessary. The 2nd point is; you don't _need_ cookies for anything except anonymous session tracking. Let's leave that to Doubleclick & Co and our own Cookie Settings on "Reject all". regards -- ,moe -- To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
