Another question about apache: The time that goes between apache delegating requests to tomcat and tomcat answering back instead of tomcat answering directly is worthwhile???
At 10:10 18/1/2002 -0500, you wrote: >> What are the advantages from using Apache with Tomcat instead of a >> stand-alone Tomcat? >> I've read the docs but I wanted to hear from other people with >> experience from using it. > >Apache is a fine tuned httpd for static content and therefore typically >suppasses Tomcat for serving static content. In addition, utilizing >Apache also allows you to use other dynamic content such as PHP, Perl, >etc... > >Our deliverables have always been with either an IIS or Apache integration >so I can't speak for a comparison of the production performance comparison >between these configurations but it basically comes down to a couple things: > >* do you want to fine tune your webserver? >* are you going to have a good deal of static content? > >If you answer yes to one or both of these then I would personally suggest >using integration. > > >--- >Michael Wentzel >Software Developer >Software As We Think - http://www.aswethink.com > >-- >To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Emerson Cargnin TRE-SC Setor de Desenvolvimento Tel: (48) 251-3700 - Ramal 3134 -- To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
