I have been used the [1]Apache/HTTP Server + [2]MOD_SSL +[3] OpenSSL + [4]TC + [5]JSSE combination. And I know [6]Apache-SSL is an alternative of MOD_SSL, but I have not heard about the opinions on the Apache-SSL yet.
Is there any specific reason you have to use Apach-ssl than mod_ssl? By shamelessly coping the statement from your message, > We don't need access to a certificate authority. I just need SSL for data > encrytpion. Are you referring the"Data Encryption" over HTTP, e.g., HTTPS,? Or, are you intended to handle the data encryption programatically over SSL? Pae [1] http://www.apache.org/ [2] http://www.modssl.org/ [3] http://www.openssl.org/ [4] http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/index.html [5] http://java.sun.com/products/jsse/ [6] http://www.apache-ssl.org/ > > I'm installing apache_ssl & open_ssl. > > open_ssl build & installed fine. > > apache-ssl-1.3.4-1.31-1 requires SSLeay ver 0.9.0b or better? > > I've searched around (rpmfind & google) and found several references > and versions. > > However, I also found a bunch of legal BS. > > 1) Are there any legal issues involved with using this in a commercial > environment? > > 2) Which flavor? of SSLeay do I need for Apache-ssl > perl-Net-SSLeay > perl-crypt-SSLeay > > We don't need access to a certificate authority. I just need SSL for data > encrytpion. > Server (or client) authentication is not needed (at least the customer > hasn't requested > it yet). I plan on using a 'self-signed' certificate. > > ThankX All > > Ron > > -- > To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
