On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 08:04:17AM -0400, Anthony W. Marino wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 07:02:38PM -0400, Anthony W. Marino wrote:
> > > Any reason for using AJP14 over AJP13?
> > > And what about mod_webapp?
> >
> > I take it that this is mod_jk and mod_jk2? IME, mod_jk and Apache 2
> > don't get along well at all[1]. The impression that I've gleaned from
> > reading past postings to this list is that mod_webapp is meant to
> > supercede mod_jk and is the preferred way of connecting Apache and
> > Tomcat.
> >
>
> If mod_webapp is the next generation then why jk2?
That question can be read in two ways: "Why did I start off using
jk2?" and "why is there a jk2 project, then?"
To answer the first question: because at the time, I hadn't done much
reading around the subject, and mod_jk was what the other admins that
I spoke to were using, albeit with apache 1.3.x
The answer to the second interpretation is probably the same :) Also,
jk offers some features that webapp doesn't, which may be an incentive
for people to want to try and make it work with apache 2.
> Is warp in the coyote connectors the mod_webapp that should be used???
Good question. The connector that makes use of it is mod_webapp, and
this is part of the jakarta-tomcat-connectors project, if that helps?
Getting a listing of the classes that are contained in the
"tomcat-*.jar" files doesn't indicate anything called "*warp*", but
that could just be because it's the protocol name....
Cheers,
Simon
--
Hanlon's Razor:
Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained
by stupidity.
--
To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
