Thanks for the patch. I will certainly give it a go. Just a question. I noticed that the first line says something about apache1.3. has this also been tested on apache2.0.x?
bye Michael Delamere ----- Original Message ----- From: "James Williamson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 5:37 PM Subject: Re: Which Apache-To-Tomcat Connector > > > > > > > > > > It isn't so. You can still serve static pages, but they'll come > > > through Tomcat and then apache, rather than being served straight from > > > apache. End result: you'll see a speed hit. This is what's being > > > fixed, as I understand it. > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 03:00:59PM +0000, Lance Smith wrote: > > > > Using: Apache 2.0.35 and Tomcat 4.0.3 on Red Hat 7.2. > > > > > > > > Say it isn't so: There is no way to serve static pages from Apache > using > > > > mod_webapp? Can anyone confirm/deny this? > > > > > > > > Lance > > We wrote a quick and dirty patch which I should get round to sending > to the Tomcat dev list which allows you to tell mod_webapp to ignore > certain types of content. It basically introduces WebappIgnore directive > to ignore certain patterns: > > i.e. WebappIgnore *.html > > Find it attached. > > Regards, > > James Williamson > www.nameonthe.net > UK Tomcat Hosting > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- > -- > To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
