Tomcat 3.3.x doesn't get a lot of testing against any 1.1.8
JDK.  What little testing it does get is done with Sun's
JDK 1.1.8.  This testing is done with a Tomcat that is built
with Sun's JDK 1.1.8.  The binary distribution is built
with Sun's JDK 1.3.1.  You might try building Tomcat 3.3 with
IBM's JDK and see if this succeeds and if so, does it still
run any better than the binary distribution you are using now.

Cheers,
Larry


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sudhakar Chandra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 12:37 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Q] Using IBM JDK with tomcat 3.3
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Here is my setup:
> 
> tomcat: 
> 3.3a
> mod_jk: 
> 3.3a
> Sun JDK: 1.1.8v1
> IBM JDK: 1.1.8
> OS: Debian GNU/Linux "testing"
> 
> When I use Sun's JDK, the ajp12 and ajp13 "workers" start accepting 
> connections.  Here are relevant bits from the log files:
> 
> Jdk11Compat: Installing jar protocol handler
> 2002-04-25 09:17:17 - SessionIdGenerator: Opening /dev/urandom
> 2002-04-25 09:17:24 - ServerXmlReader: 
> Config=$TOMCAT_HOME/conf/server.xml
> 2002-04-25 09:17:24 - PathSetter: home=/usr/share/tomcat
> 2002-04-25 09:17:25 - ContextXmlReader: Context 
> config=$TOMCAT_HOME/conf/apps-examples.xml
> 2002-04-25 09:17:25 - Ctx(/jsp) : Setting debug to 1
> 2002-04-25 09:17:25 - AutoWebApp: Auto-Adding DEFAULT:/
> 2002-04-25 09:17:25 - AutoWebApp: Loaded from config: 
> DEFAULT:/examples
> 2002-04-25 09:17:25 - ContextManager: Tomcat configured and 
> in stable state
> 2002-04-25 09:17:25 - ContextManager: Adding  DEFAULT:/examples
> 2002-04-25 09:17:25 - ContextManager: Adding  DEFAULT:/jsp
> 2002-04-25 09:17:25 - ContextManager: Adding  DEFAULT:/ROOT
> 
> thaths@daemon:[51] ~ $ telnet localhost 8007
> Trying 127.0.0.1...
> Connected to localhost.
> Escape character is '^]'.
> Connection closed by foreign host.
> thaths@daemon:[52] ~ $ telnet localhost 8009
> Trying 127.0.0.1...
> Connected to localhost.
> Escape character is '^]'.
> Connection closed by foreign host.
> 
> However, when I start tomcat using IBM's JDK, ajp12 and ajp13 
> "workers" 
> do not accept connections.  They don't even start up as far as I can 
> tell.  Here are relevant bits from the log files:
> 
> Jdk11Compat: Installing jar protocol handler
> 2002-04-25 09:21:52 - SessionIdGenerator: Opening /dev/urandom
> 2002-04-25 09:22:02 - ServerXmlReader: 
> Config=$TOMCAT_HOME/conf/server.xml
> 2002-04-25 09:22:02 - PathSetter: home=/usr/share/tomcat
> 2002-04-25 09:22:03 - ContextXmlReader: Context
> config=$TOMCAT_HOME/conf/apps-examples.xml
> 2002-04-25 09:22:03 - Ctx(/jsp) : Setting debug to 1
> 2002-04-25 09:22:03 - AutoWebApp: Auto-Adding DEFAULT:/
> 2002-04-25 09:22:03 - AutoWebApp: Loaded from config: 
> DEFAULT:/examples
> 2002-04-25 09:22:04 - ContextManager: Tomcat configured and 
> in stable state
> 2002-04-25 09:22:04 - ContextManager: Adding  DEFAULT:/examples
> 2002-04-25 09:22:04 - ContextManager: Adding  DEFAULT:/jsp
> 2002-04-25 09:22:04 - ContextManager: Adding  DEFAULT:/ROOT
> 
> thaths@daemon:[55] ~ $ telnet localhost 8007
> Trying 127.0.0.1...
> telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: Connection refused
> thaths@daemon:[56] ~ $ telnet localhost 8009
> Trying 127.0.0.1...
> telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: Connection refused
> 
> I'd really like to work using the IBM JDK.  What am I doing 
> wrong?  The 
> configurations remain the same in both cases.  Your help would be 
> greatly appreciated.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Thaths
> -- 
> Lisa:  I'm studying for the math fair.  If I win, I'll bring home a
> brand new protractor.
> Homer: Too bad we don't live on a farm.
> thaths at aunet.org   Slacker At Large   http://www.aunet.org/~thaths/
> Key fingerprint = 8A 84 2E 67 10 9A 64 03  24 38 B6 AB 1B 6E 8C E4
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 

--
To unsubscribe:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to