You shouldn't have to give it a fake extension I don't think. the
web.xml would be the ideal place to map it though. I've done mappings
such as just mapping the class name to /, as in:
<servlet-mapping>
<servlet-name>theName</servlet-name>
<url-pattern>/theName</url-pattern>
</servlet-mapping>
... and it worked just fine.
Charles N. Harvey III wrote:
>Andris,
>You will have to map *.something instead of the whole path.
>
>I haven't looked at mod_jk2 but I am guessing it will be something like
>this:
>
><Location /*.jsp>JkUriSet worker ajp13</Location>
>
>Now, to map servlets you will either have to specify each of them by
>name.
>
><Location /myservlet>JkUriSet worker ajp13</Location>
><Location /myservlet2>JkUriSet worker ajp13</Location>
>
>Or give them a fake extension:
>
><Location /*.servlet>JkUriSet worker ajp13</Location>
>
>Then, in your web.xml change the <servlet-mapping> to something like:
><servlet-mapping>
> <servlet-name>myservlet</servlet-name>
> <url-pattern>/myservlet.servlet</url-pattern>
></servlet-mapping>
><servlet-mapping>
> <servlet-name>myservlet2</servlet-name>
> <url-pattern>/myservlet2.servlet</url-pattern>
></servlet-mapping>
>
>
>Make sense? I think choice two is much easier since you do not have
>to keep changing your mappings in Apache. But you decide for yourself.
>
>
>Charile
>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
