Also don't forget that with Apache2 you have access to mod_vhost_alias and mod_vhost_aliasIP which can simplify things greatly. Examples are in the Apache documentation that is installed with Apache 2.0.42 http://localhost/manual/mod/mod_vhost_alias.html http://localhost/manual/vhosts/mass.html See also http://localhost/manual/vhosts/name-based.html
rls "Matt Raible" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 09/25/2002 08:29 PM Please respond to "Tomcat Users List" To: "'Tomcat Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: Subject: Virtual Hosts: Connecting Apache 2.x to Tomcat 4.x (was mod_jk, Windows XP, Tomcat 4.0.5 - issues) Sweet - I got it all working - now for a new question. What is the recommended setup for an ISP/ASP with one box? The article I modified my workers.properties after (http://www.ubeans.com/tomcat/) seems to be geared for "load-balancing" rather than an ISP/ASP situation. So I added the following and it seemed to achieve what I wanted. <VirtualHost 192.168.0.3:80> ServerName localhost JkMount /*.jsp tomcat1 JkMount /servlet/* tomcat1 </VirtualHost> # Second Virtual Host. Also accessible via HTTPS # <VirtualHost 192.168.0.3:80> ServerName fatbastard JkMount /*.jsp tomcat2 JkMount /servlet/* tomcat2 </VirtualHost> Where requests to http://localhost will go to tomcat 1 and http://fatbastard will go to tomcat 2. So if I now have to configure this on one Linux server for approx 5 (initially) different tomcat instances. So do you recommend setting up a bunch of customer1.mycompany.com aliases that go to the same IP, or stuffing a bunch of NIC cards into the one box? Thanks for all your help - this stuff is great, and folks on this list have made it very easy to setup. Matt > -----Original Message----- > From: Robert L Sowders [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 6:25 PM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: Re: mod_jk, Windows XP, Tomcat 4.0.5 - issues > > > No, you should stay with 2.0.42. You need the dll from the > Jakarta build > web site, it has been built against 2.0.42. The one you > downloaded has > not been up-graded yet to work with 2.0.42 yet. > > http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk2 > /nightly/win32/ > > rls > > > > > "Matt Raible" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > 09/25/2002 05:10 PM > Please respond to "Tomcat Users List" > > > To: "'Tomcat Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > cc: > Subject: mod_jk, Windows XP, Tomcat 4.0.5 - issues > > I'm trying to use one of the mod_jk.dll downloads at http://www.acg-gmbh.de/mod_jk/ and having no luck. The errors I'm getting is: 1. The Apache service named reported the following error: >>> Apache.exe: module "C:\jakarta-tomcat-connectors-4.0.4-src\jk\native\apache-2.0\mod_jk.c" is not compatible with this version of Apache (found 20020628, need 20020903). . 2. The Apache service named reported the following error: >>> Please contact the vendor for the correct version. . I have the following in http.conf # Using mod_jk.dll to redirect dynamic calls to Tomcat LoadModule jk_module modules/mod_jk.dll # # Configure mod_jk # JkWorkersFile conf/workers.properties JkLogFile logs/mod_jk.log JkLogLevel info And I've downloaded http://www.acg-gmbh.de/mod_jk/Release/mod_jk.dll. My configuration is Windows XP SP1, Apache 2.0.42, Tomcat 4.0.5. Looks like I need Apache 2.0.40 eh? Thanks, Matt -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>