Hello Wendy, The CoyoteConnector still supports the jk connector in addition to its support for jk2. You can still use your listeners to create the mod_jk.conf auto-generated files for jk.
Jake Monday, December 02, 2002, 4:00:33 PM, you wrote: WS> John wrote: >> You need two Listener tags, minimum. One at the Server "level" in >> server.xml, and one at each Host "level". WS> Thanks! (It was in the documentation, I stopped reading too early.) I put WS> in the other <Listener> tag under the <Host> tag, and it seems to be WS> working. However, I am seeing several warnings in catalina.out after each WS> request WS> WARNING: server has closed the current connection (-1) WS> Dec 2, 2002 2:24:18 PM org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket processConnection WS> (total of 6 of these warnings for each request) WS> I thought I was using mod_jk with Ajp13, but now I see in server.xml: WS> <!-- Define a Coyote/JK2 AJP 1.3 Connector on port 8009 --> WS> <Connector className="org.apache.coyote.tomcat4.CoyoteConnector" WS> port="8009" minProcessors="5" maxProcessors="75" WS> enableLookups="true" redirectPort="8443" WS> acceptCount="10" debug="0" connectionTimeout="20000" WS> useURIValidationHack="false" WS> protocolHandlerClassName="org.apache.jk.server.JkCoyoteHandler"/> WS> <!-- Define an AJP 1.3 Connector on port 8009 --> WS> <!-- WS> <Connector className="org.apache.ajp.tomcat4.Ajp13Connector" WS> port="8009" minProcessors="5" maxProcessors="75" WS> acceptCount="10" debug="0"/> WS> --> WS> And I'm confused. Should I switch the comments around and use the WS> Ajp13Connector instead? WS> This is HP-UX 11 with Apache 2 (provided by HP) and Tomcat 4.1.12 (binary WS> distribution from Jakarta). WS> Thanks, -- Best regards, Jacob mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>