There are binaries for Apache 2.0.43, all over the place. http://httpd.apache.org
I gave you a link to the binary Red Hat-compatible RPM for 2.0.43 so that you could upgrade your RH 2.0.40 installation. I gave you a link to the binary for mod_jk that is compatible with 2.0.43. Sorry, but I just don't see what else you need. John > -----Original Message----- > From: neal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 2:54 PM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache > > > Actually, I was just trying to find binaries for compatible > versions of > either Apache or mod_jk. So, I wanted to find either (a) > Apache 2.0.43 or > (b) Mod_jk 2.0.40. > > Perhaps its me and my phobias of doing a src build on Linux > (which I barely > know) but I am just not comfortable doing a src build. I > presume I'd need to > download and learn some C compiler to do the task ... and > that's on top of > barely knowing the OS! > > Regarding the pedantics, *IF* the current supported version > of Apache is > 2.0.43 ... shouldn't there be binaries for it? And even if > not, should > there be binaries of mod_jk for 2.0.40? It seems like an out-of-sync > doulbe whammy! > > :( > > Neal > > -----Original Message----- > From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 11:40 AM > To: 'Tomcat Users List' > Subject: RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache > > > > Sorry, you lost me. You asked for a link to mod_jk for Apache 2.0.43, > that's what I gave you. > > .43 is the supported Apache version. I don't use RPMs, but > it should be > fairly trivial to upgrade a RH installation with Apache 2.0.40 to .43. > > Not to be pedantic, but the current "official" Apache HTTP > release is .43, > regardless of whether Red Hat is current or not...it seems > reasonable to me > that another Jakarta project would support that version and > not earlier > versions. > > For example: > ftp://ftp.cise.ufl.edu/pub/mirrors/redhat-contrib/libc6/i386/h > ttpd-2.0.43-1. > i386.rpm > > Most RH mirrors will have it. > > John > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: neal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 2:20 PM > > To: Tomcat Users List > > Subject: RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache > > > > > > Yes, but when I go to the Linux dir it says > > > > "mod_jk-2.0.43.so is for Apache 2.0.42 (and 2.0.43) " > > > > It does not appear that a binary version is available that is > > compatible > > with Apache 2.0.40 (the version shipping with RedHat Linux 8 > > by the way). > > > > I am suprised this particular build is not available. Is > > there something I > > am missing? :( > > > > Thanks. > > Neal > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 4:44 AM > > To: 'Tomcat Users List' > > Subject: RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache > > > > > > > > http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/ > > release/v1.2.2 > > /bin/linux/i386/ > > > > Browse around in that tree to find others if needed. > > > > John > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: neal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2003 8:57 PM > > > To: Tomcat Users List > > > Subject: RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache > > > > > > > > > Thanks. I've never had to compile anything like this on > > > Linux and am a > > > little hesitant to do so (more of a windows guy to be > > > honost). Do you know > > > of any place that I could locate pre-compiled *compatible* > > > binaries for > > > either apache 2.0.43 or mod_jk 2.0.40? Or some other > compatible set? > > > > > > Thanks. > > > Neal > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2003 1:23 PM > > > To: 'Tomcat Users List' > > > Subject: RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache > > > > > > > > > > > > You need Apache 2.0.43. .42 might work, but .41 and .40 won't. > > > > > > Or, you can build your own. > > > > > > John > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: neal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 6:50 PM > > > To: Tomcat Users List > > > Subject: RE: Mod_JK.c not compatiable with version of Apache > > > > > > > > > Does anyone know why I would get this error when installing > > > mod_JK 2.0.43 on > > > Linux 8, with Tomcat 4.1 and Apache 2.0: > > > > > > "mod_jk.c not compatible with this version of Apache". > > > > > > I presume that when it refers to the "mod_jk.c" it is > > referring to the > > > cmopuled code it derives from the LoadModule command to load > > > the so (?). > > > > > > I downloaded the mod_jk-2.0.43.so from the Apache connectors > > > archives. I > > > just used the same version (but as a DLL) successfully on > my windows > > > workstation. > > > > > > Any thoughts? > > > > > > Thanks. > > > Neal > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: neal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 1:36 PM > > > To: Tomcat Users List > > > Subject: RE: Mod_JK - JkMount Invalid Command > > > > > > > > > John, > > > > > > Your tutorial ROCKS! > > > > > > It turns out there were 4 distinct problems which I was able > > > to identify in > > > part by using the Apache.exe and in part by comparing your > > > steps to the > > > collage I had compiled from other incomplete sources. > > > > > > My primary problem was that mod_jk.dll was not being > recognized so I > > > replaced it with the build you were using > > > (mod_jk-2.0.43.dll) and from there is was pretty much home free! > > > > > > Now on to doing the same on the Linux server (I hope its > reasonably > > > similar). :) > > > > > > Thanks again. > > > Neal > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 11:22 AM > > > To: 'Tomcat Users List' > > > Subject: RE: Mod_JK - JkMount Invalid Command > > > > > > > > > > > > Uncomment those two lines. > > > > > > Then, open up a command window and call Apache like this: > > > > > > SOME_DRIVE:\SOME\PATH\TO\APACHE\BIN\APACHE.EXE -t > > > > > > This will check the syntax of Apache's httpd.conf without > > > starting Apache. > > > Fix the errors, then call it with "-t" again until you see > > > "Syntax OK". > > > > > > The whole process is described in my HOWTO: > > > http://www.johnturner.com/howto/winxp-howto.html > > > > > > While the version I use in my HOWTO is 4.1.18, the > > > configuration steps are > > > identical, just substitute "4.0.4" wherever you see "4.1.18". > > > > > > John > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: neal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 2:17 PM > > > > To: Tomcat Users List > > > > Subject: Mod_JK - JkMount Invalid Command > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm trying to setup ModJK for the first time between > > Apache 2.0 and > > > > TOmcat 4.0.4, on Windows 2000. > > > > > > > > I am stuck with an error I was hoping someone might recognize: > > > > > > > > It tells me "invliad JKMount command. Perhaps mispelled or > > > defined by > > > > a module not included in the server configuration". > > > > > > > > I presume this is because I have commented out these lines: > > > > > > > > #LoadModule jk_module modules/mod_jk.so > > > > #AddModule mod_jk.c > > > > > > > > But if I *DONT* comment these out, the test configuration window > > > > disappears almost as quickly as it appears and I can't > > see what the > > > > problem is. There > > > > is nothing being logged, and if I try to start from the > > > Apache Service > > > > manager I simply get a message stating "The requested > > > > operation failed.". > > > > > > > > > > > > Anyone know what's going on? :( > > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > Neal > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > > -- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > > -- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > --- > > > Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. > > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > > > Version: 6.0.443 / Virus Database: 248 - Release Date: 1/10/2003 > > > > > > > > > --- > > > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > > > Version: 6.0.443 / Virus Database: 248 - Release Date: 1/10/2003 > > > > > > > > > -- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > > -- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
