It still depends. If the graphics are large, or numerous then you may still win with Apache+jk. The only way to know for sure is to try it both ways. If you don't have the time/budget/patience for this, then my first guess would be that Tomcat-Standalone would be a good option.
"Simone Chiaretta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Hello All, > I'm in the process of setting up a real-production server to serve a dynamic > jsp driven website. > And I'm facing the decision if using tomcat alone or apache+jk+tomcat. > > From what I've read on the ML I think that is best to use tomcat alone > because I've got a completely dynamic web site, with just a few graphical > images and not static html pages... so I think that the double step of > apache that ask tomcat to give me a response is just a performance > degradation... > > Are my thoughts right? or am I missing something? > > or maybe using JK2 instead of JK will give me benefetis even if the site is > fully jsp driven? > > Thank you all > Simone > > ------------------------- > Simone Chiaretta > www.piyosailing.com/S > Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
