if you remove the vhost for host1 completely from apache to which tomcat do you get mapped?
-----Original Message----- From: John Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 11:10 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Seperate tomcats - one apache It doesn't work at all. Believe me, I've now spent 14 hours trying to make it work. I posted yesterday exactly what I have done so far ("Help with one Apache, mod_jk, two Tomcats, no load balancing"). http://host1.com:8080 -> Tomcat 1 works great http://host2.com:8081 -> Tomcat 2 works great Apache Virtual Host host1 (http://host1.com) -> Tomcat 1 Apache Virtual Host host2 (http://host2.com) -> ALSO Tomcat 1 I've tried many variations of workers.properties, even setting up load- balanced workers as suggesting in http://www.ubeans.com/tomcat (private JVM section) even though I don't want load-balancing at all. mod_jk.log: [Mon Mar 31 16:48:59 2003] [mod_jk.c (471)]: agsp=80 agsn=host2.com hostn=host2.com shostn=host1.com cbsport=0 sport=0 [Mon Mar 31 16:48:59 2003] [jk_ajp_common.c (1391)]: Into jk_worker_t::get_endpoint ... ... [Mon Mar 31 16:48:59 2003] [jk_uri_worker_map.c (460)]: Into jk_uri_worker_map_t::map_uri_to_worker [Mon Mar 31 16:48:59 2003] [jk_uri_worker_map.c (477)]: Attempting to map URI '/images/A2_incent.jpg' [Mon Mar 31 16:48:59 2003] [jk_uri_worker_map.c (502)]: jk_uri_worker_map_t::map_uri_to_worker, Found a context match tomcat1 -> / [Mon Mar 31 16:48:59 2003] [mod_jk.c (1277)]: Into handler r->proxyreq=0 r->handler=jakarta-servlet r->notes=1578240 worker=tomcat1 [Mon Mar 31 16:48:59 2003] [jk_worker.c (132)]: Into wc_get_worker_for_name tomcat1 [Mon Mar 31 16:48:59 2003] [jk_worker.c (136)]: wc_get_worker_for_name, done found a worker I don't know about you, but line number one there looks pretty fishy to me...I have no idea what "shostn" means (shared host name?), but it shouldn't be "host1", it should be "host2", and the worker found should be "tomcat2", not "tomcat1". I am definitely open to suggestions on how to make this work, but I can tell you that I am no stranger to setting up mod_jk (different port numbers, etc), and at this time this DOES NOT work for me with Apache .43, Tomcat 4.1.18, Solaris 8, and built-from-source mod_jk. John On Tue, 1 Apr 2003 10:46:38 -0700, George Sexton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I routinely run via the CATALINA_BASE method for multiple instances and > have > no problems. > > Using mod_jk, all you have to do is define the connectors to be on > different > ports, and then configure each servlet engine to run mod_jk on a > different > port. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Steve Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 9:46 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Seperate tomcats - one apache > > > Hi all, > > I'm having some fun with some applications supplied to us that may be > casuing a problem wiht each other, i.e. one application may be causing > the > whole tocat environment to fail - thus affecting the others. > > I'm toying with the idea of trying to run a signle apache but with > multiple tomcats - one per application. Does anyone have any views on > this > ? > > Cheers - Steve > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
