Howdy,
Well, that provided a bit of amusement for today ;) ;)

You can put in an enhancement request to use 32bits for the port number.
It's a low-priority item, not sure it will be done any time soon.

Yoav Shapira

>> >14009 works
>> >48009 doesn't.  The apache error log says that it can't connect.
>> >According to tomcat the Connector is listening and a netstat shows
the
>> >port in a LISTEN state.
>>
>> I have a random guess harkening back to my C days: > 32767 won't
work.
>> Give it a shot.  Has to do with 2^16 int size bytes used to store the
>> port number.
>>
>
>
>You got it.  :)  32767 yes, 32768 no.
>
>So is this still a bug?  or is this a "workaround"?



This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business communication, and 
may contain information that is confidential, proprietary and/or privileged.  This 
e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed, and may not be 
saved, copied, printed, disclosed or used by anyone else.  If you are not the(an) 
intended recipient, please immediately delete this e-mail from your computer system 
and notify the sender.  Thank you.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to