2009/1/4  <[email protected]>:
> On Sun, 04 Jan 2009 20:36:07 +0100 Szymon G
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>anyway, this is what i wanted to send:
>>(..)
>
> If you look closely the difference between originals and rejects
> aren't that different. Patching a clean kernel source with CCS
> (before GRSec) should show the patches get added perfectly.
> Probably the GRSecurity patch messed up some newlines.
>
> As far as I can see the only thing that needs some more attention
> is the af_unix.c.rej, but if you read the original code next to the
> reject you'll probably be able to insert the missing lines manually.
>
>
> Regards, unSpawn


hm... i've asked a friend of mine about help /he knows *a bit* more
than i/, he get some errors.
he will look closer on it tomorrow (i hope ;p)- so, in case of
problems, i'll send more messages later. anyway, i hope it will be
working together fine.

>
> * BTW, if you don't mind me asking, what is it you use TOMOYO
> mainly for?

well... i dont mind asking :>
i'm not running any server, i dont have any computer-related job, i
wanna check it just becouse I'm courious about it... i'm a bit
interested in computers' safety, especially in apparmor/tomoyo-like
systems (well... i just cant get selinux :/)

your sincerely
szymon

_______________________________________________
tomoyo-users-en mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.sourceforge.jp/mailman/listinfo/tomoyo-users-en

Reply via email to