James Morris <[email protected]> wrote:

> > Add calls to path-based security hooks into CacheFiles as, unlike
> > inode-based security, these aren't implicit in the vfs_mkdir() and similar
> > calls.
> 
> Adding fsdevel for further review - cachefiles is essentially part of the 
> vfs, right ?

It certainly makes good use of the VFS interfaces, so I suppose in that sense,
yes.

David

_______________________________________________
tomoyo-users-en mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.sourceforge.jp/mailman/listinfo/tomoyo-users-en

Reply via email to