For the systems we roll out here we use clones backed up with BackupEDGE
to DAT.  Our most recent Compaqs, using the Intel 845G chipset, dog on
SCSI transfers to the IDE drives (using either an Adaptec 2940 or
29160).  I'm talking my first one out of the box ran the restore for
over eight hours and didn't get halfway through the tape.  I restored to
the drive on another system and slapped it back in the box and it worked
fine.

Such was the problem that I went to backing a clone to an IDE.  It took
20 minutes instead of 2 hours (or 8+/unknown on 845G).  I just had
BackupEDGE use /dev/hdc.  I did the same on my initial use of the CPIO
command with the same setup.  BackupEDGE, however, stores only the real
data from a number of informix chunks, while tracking their virtual size
and recreating them correctly on restore.  This results in a smaller
backup in less time.

Based on this experience, if I were to use a pluggable (preferrably
hot-) drive I'd just have it on it's own (hdc or hdd, on the second
channel for improved throughput during backup).  Plug in, run backup,
pull out and stow.

Surely someone has a hot-plug module for the kernel...buy their thing
and get their software while still leaving the drive as a standard
drive.


sh

On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 11:05, Tom Oehser wrote:
> 
> Although I have always been against this, the price of a DLT or AIT or LTO
> tape cartridge that can hold 100 gigs is just about climbing over that of
> a hard drive.  When you add in the cost of the tape drives that can do it,
> plus the better transfer speed and drastically better random access, I'm
> starting to consider reconsidering... ASSUMING that you really do install a
> hotswap and buy drives the way you would have bought tapes, it is hard to see
> the advantage  of investing in DLT or AIT or LTO.
> 
> Does anyone have a recommendation for IDE hotswap bays?
> 
> What about getting the kernel to recognize the swaps?
> 
> -Tom


-- 
Scot Harkins (KA5KDU)
Systems Engineer
Apropos Retail Management Systems
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.aproposretail.com

Reply via email to