Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 22:34, Jie Zhang wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 03:49, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 03:25, Hennerich, Michael wrote:
we dont need permission from them. the flash drivers are simple ELF
binaries that get loaded into the on-chip memory. then there is some
communication so the driver knows what to program into the flash. so
we'd have to find the protocol used.
The VDSP Flash driver protocol is not a secret - Google for
'AFP_Buffer'.
- And you will find pages like this one:
you'd think ADI would be capable of documenting this properly
themselves in VDSP ;)
There have been always people writing their own flash drivers.
I would appreciate if we stick to same protocol.
you're right that using the same method wouldnt be just a "GNU working
with VDSP and vice versa", we'd also make customer lives easier for
the ones who have written their own
throwing a simple script + gdb together is hindered by the .text bug in
gdb
https://blackfin.uclinux.org/gf/tracker/4337
Sorry. I'll take a look today.
is binutils-2.20 usable now (including gdb) ? i can see if the bug
still exists there.
The gdb patch I sent out before should compile. The testsuite result
looks not too bad. But I'm afraid I cannot say it's usable.
Jie
_______________________________________________
Toolchain-devel mailing list
Toolchain-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org
https://blackfin.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/toolchain-devel
