How does SFW solve this problem? SFW does not have those functions any where. Moving ksh93 to SFW will only add a lot new problems, like building ksh93 with gcc will result in a performance loss, gcc will add new bugs like broken nan handling and the SFW build infrastructure is not suited for ksh93. Quality will also drop, because building with Studio and gcc locates some bug classes easier.
Olga 2010/5/27 Alan Coopersmith <[email protected]>: > ольга крыжановская wrote: >> Roland also said that perl has the same problem. Since perl in ON >> needs to be build with both Studio and gcc compilers the perl build >> had to downgrade its floating point support from long double to double >> which causes interoperability problems with 3rd party perl software >> and turns Solaris /bin/perl unusable for numeric applications. > > That problem should be solved now that perl integrates to SFW, not ON. > We offered many times to solve many ksh93 integration headaches by > doing the same there... > > -- > -Alan Coopersmith- [email protected] > Oracle Solaris Platform Engineering: X Window System > > _______________________________________________ > ksh93-integration-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/ksh93-integration-discuss > -- __ . . __ (o.\ \/ /.o) [email protected] \__\/\/__/ MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer /O /==\ O\ TEL +49 641 3992797 (;O/ \/ \O;) _______________________________________________ tools-compilers mailing list [email protected]
