On 2007-06-11 15:55, Mike Kupfer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>>> "Bill" == Bill Sommerfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Bill> what shows up in "hg log" of the new name after a rename?
>
> Current behavior: it depends on the options that are used and whether
> you name the file. [...]
>
> athyra$ hg log -f bar
> changeset: 1:bdb9ecb3876d
> tag: tip
> user: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> date: Mon Jun 11 15:39:52 2007 -0700
> summary: rename foo -> bar
>
> changeset: 0:c6f6663be52f
> user: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> date: Mon Jun 11 15:39:18 2007 -0700
> summary: add foo to repo
>
> I guess this is okay. It'd be nice if the "hg log bar" output gave an
> indication that there's more that could be seen with -f. And IIRC,
> there are situations where it does provide a hint like that. Maybe it
> should provide that hint in all cases...?
FWIW, there is information about the renames (i.e. the list of source
files, and their destination after the rename operation) when one runs:
hg --debug log -f bar
A sample repository with two renames happening in one commit shows:
% changeset: 1:5725e9bf3947c7fba3f698294ee8bae7de4a741c
% tag: tip
% parent: 0:c82badc1414a182cc743dcb67b60988cb94452d5
% parent: -1:0000000000000000000000000000000000000000
% manifest: 1:cc1560cf0bdf23cfc5411f915289b0b0bc19e434
% user: keramida
% date: Wed Jun 13 03:14:38 2007 +0300
% files+: bar bar2
% files-: foo foo2
% extra: branch=default
% description:
% rename foo{,2} -> bar{,2}
%
%
% changeset: 0:c82badc1414a182cc743dcb67b60988cb94452d5
% parent: -1:0000000000000000000000000000000000000000
% parent: -1:0000000000000000000000000000000000000000
% manifest: 0:11a7f1e3ce3ed33834eb232ec74e31df0ff8f481
% user: keramida
% date: Wed Jun 13 03:14:10 2007 +0300
% files+: foo foo2
% extra: branch=default
% description:
% add foo and foo2
_______________________________________________
tools-discuss mailing list
tools-discuss@opensolaris.org
