Peter Memishian wrote:
[snip]
> > Again, from memory, my recollection is that ctfconvert is unhappy due to
> the
> > "#", which ctfconvert's name() (st_parse.c, around line 501) doesn't treat
> > as valid. Adding it there seemed to bandaid it, but I don't think size
> > information for the actual symbol would be correct. (/#vla./ represents the
> > sizor, not the vla itself)
>
> Hmm, I didn't see a bug report covering this. Seems like one needs to be
> filed.
Mhhh... I can't find my orginal bug report... ;-(
... yesterday I filed a new one, see CR #6575435 ('ctf tools cannot
handle C99 VLAs ("variable length arrays")') ...
----
Bye,
Roland
--
__ . . __
(o.\ \/ /.o) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\__\/\/__/ MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer
/O /==\ O\ TEL +49 641 7950090
(;O/ \/ \O;)
_______________________________________________
tools-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
