Hi Jonathon,
Jonathan Adams wrote:
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 09:08:51AM +0100, m...@bruningsystems.com wrote:
::walk kmem -n kmem_alloc_8192
My proposed walker doesn't actually have a '-n' argument; it seems redundant
given the "::walk kmem_alloc_8192" walker.
I based the "-n" argument on these lines in the new kmem.c
338 kmem_cache_help(void)
339 {
340 static const mdb_help_def_t options[] = {
341 { "-n name", "Name of kmem cache (or partial name
to match)." },
342 { NULL, NULL }
343 };
So this is only for ::help kmem_cache ?
thanks,
max
_______________________________________________
tools-discuss mailing list
tools-discuss@opensolaris.org
