On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 02:17:59PM -0700, Rod Evans wrote: > >b) folding rpcsec.so.1 into libnsl and moving libgss into /lib > > This sounds feasible too, and would simplify and improve the performance > of the system as a whole. Don't forget, filtees are another object ld.so.1 > has to load - the less the better.
But the filtee doesn't get loaded unless the filter is referenced, right? Or does ld.so.1 load even filtees unless -z lazy/RTLD_LAZY? I'll ask around about moving libgss into /lib. I don't want to bother with CD/miniroot sizing issues if that's likely to cause others heartburn. > Why not fold rpcsec.so.1 and libgss into libnsl :-) Well, libgss can't be folded into libnsl, not unless we leave a libgss filter around. And most uses of libgss don't come from libnsl. So I'd feel uncomfortable about folding libgss into libnsl. Thanks, Nico --
