DaB. wrote: > BTW: If the wm-server-admins hadn't drop commons from s2, we wouldn't need a > dump ;)
Sure. What about restricting drops so they aren't replicated? That would make toolserver resistant against some datalosses at tampa (including careless sysadmins ;) ). However, a subsequent create database + tables would fail and their inserts would be a mess with the previous rows... _______________________________________________ Toolserver-l mailing list (Toolserver-l@lists.wikimedia.org) https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l Posting guidelines for this list: https://wiki.toolserver.org/view/Mailing_list_etiquette
