Titoxd @ Wikimedia wrote: > Looks good, but there is one bit in the page that has a bit of unclear > wording: > > "The source code of every tool is licensed under a free (like BSD) > or /GPL-compatible/^[1] > <https://wiki.toolserver.org/view/Toollizenz/draft/en#cite_note-0> > license by default, if it is at all possible. If this is not possible > due to a less free component (like a code library), the source code > adopts the license of the library by default." > > Would it be safe to say that the source code would be dual-licensed > here, or am I reading it wrong? > > Titoxd.
No. That text would allow to use the code under GPL (BSD is itself GPL-compatible). _______________________________________________ Toolserver-l mailing list (Toolserver-l@lists.wikimedia.org) https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l Posting guidelines for this list: https://wiki.toolserver.org/view/Mailing_list_etiquette
