(anonymous) wrote: >> Even more: If Labs replication isn't bound by Toolserver >> tradition, it would be *very* nice not to fragment the data >> according to the different WMF clusters, plus Commons or >> not, plus (separate) user databases or not, but have one >> cluster where users can join as logic suggests. As Toolser- >> ver merges Commons onto other clusters already, this seems >> to be possible with MySQL.
> It's possible, you just need bigger servers which can hold all dbs. > (plus some master/slave replication for user tables) > I suppose it will use the same clusters as WMF. After all, there's a > reason the WMF clusters needed to be splitted. Sure, but tools outside production probably don't need that extra millisecond those clusters are aiming for. Take the Analytics Team for example: They happily consider different tools because they have different goals. Tim _______________________________________________ Toolserver-l mailing list (Toolserver-l@lists.wikimedia.org) https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l Posting guidelines for this list: https://wiki.toolserver.org/view/Mailing_list_etiquette
