DaB. wrote: >rev_lenght will remain as it is – the problem is that rev_lenght was not >there >from the very beginning and was never (AFAIK) back-populated; so very old >rows >has no lenght and are NULL.
Related: <https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12188>. MZMcBride _______________________________________________ Toolserver-l mailing list (Toolserver-l@lists.wikimedia.org) https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l Posting guidelines for this list: https://wiki.toolserver.org/view/Mailing_list_etiquette
