Remove wiki offline Do not allow diffrent languages on same feeds Delete unused accounts Delete dangerous information Acknowledge that the sole creator could be anyone, and expects more order in a hectic database with too much junk being reedited over and over. Once its written correctly do not allow repeaters to do over incorrectly work that was ligit. Figure out how many angles are approaching the database. This toolserver can cause havoc or can contain order depends on proper knowledge used in operating it. Thanks MILASTAR.TS.RO On May 1, 2013 9:17 PM, "Patricia Pintilie" <pintilieemp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/";><img > alt="Creative Commons License" style="border-width:0" src=" > http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/3.0/88x31.png"; /></a><br />This work is > licensed under a <a rel="license" href=" > http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/";>Creative Commons Attribution > 3.0 Unported License</a>. > On May 1, 2013 8:49 PM, "Ryan Lane" <rl...@wikimedia.org> wrote: > >> On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Tim Landscheidt >> <t...@tim-landscheidt.de>wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> at the office hour yesterday >>> (cf. >>> http://bots.wmflabs.org/~wm-bot/logs/%23wikimedia-office/20130430.txt): >>> >>> | [...] >>> | <Coren> multichill: The long story short; replicating >>> | databases is happening soon (Within the month) >>> | Replicating multiple copies of commons and wikidata >>> | isn't going to happen that way; it needs to be built >>> | into application logic or using federated tables. >>> | Almost /all/ of the problems the TS have had with >>> | replication were caused by that redundancy and >>> | trying to keep it synced. >>> | <multichill> Coren: So you're basically saying Toollabs is >>> | useless for me >>> | <Platonides> {{ref needed}} >>> | <Coren> We're all more than happy to help you (and any other >>> | maintainer) with adapting your tools to work in that >>> | setup. >>> | <scfc_de> Coren: In that case, Tools will not be able to >>> | replace Toolserver. >>> | <giftpfla1ze> what are federated tables btw? >>> | <Ryan_Lane> AFAIK toolserver will also have this limitation >>> | at some point >>> | <scfc_de> Ryan_Lane: What do you mean? >>> | [...] >>> >>> There were never answers to this, so I bring it up here >>> again: >>> >>> 1. How were "almost /all/ of the problems the TS have had >>> with replication" "caused by that redundancy and trying >>> to keep it synced"? >>> >>> 2. What limitation will the Toolserver have at some point? >>> >>> >> As to #2: From what I've been told this has to do with future sharding >> plans for the databases, and due to a change in how we'll be doing >> replication. Of course, I've heard this in passing. For answers to both of >> these questions you'll need to talk to binasher and/or notpeter on IRC, as >> they are the ones doing the database work. >> >> - Ryan >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Toolserver-l mailing list (Toolserver-l@lists.wikimedia.org) >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l >> Posting guidelines for this list: >> https://wiki.toolserver.org/view/Mailing_list_etiquette >> >
_______________________________________________ Toolserver-l mailing list (Toolserver-l@lists.wikimedia.org) https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l Posting guidelines for this list: https://wiki.toolserver.org/view/Mailing_list_etiquette
![http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/3.0/88x31.png"](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/3.0/88x31.png"){kind=link}