There is a BIG difference (Legally) between reverse Engineering for personal use, and publishing the results. Bill--W4BSG
----- Original Message ----- From: "ZR" <z...@jeremy.mv.com> To: <he...@vitelcom.net> Cc: <topband@contesting.com> Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 7:26 PM Subject: Re: Topband: 2 Parallel Beverages > Has DXE actually made that claim publicly? > I fail to see how they can stop anyone from reverse engineering for > personal > use. > > I doubt they could even spell Customer Relations from reports Ive heard. > > Carl > KM1H > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Herb Schoenbohm" <he...@vitelcom.net> > To: "ZR" <z...@jeremy.mv.com> > Cc: <topband@contesting.com> > Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 8:12 PM > Subject: Re: Topband: 2 Parallel Beverages > > >> On 5/23/2012 6:51 PM, ZR wrote: >>> Is this box sealed in epoxy? Why hasnt someone reverse engineered it and >>> published the schematic? >>> If anyone has a bad one send it to me; the least I can do is look at it >>> with a VNA or a GR bridge. >>> >>> Carl >>> KM1H >>> >>> >> The box is cast aluminum and relatively easy to take apart. However DXE >> appears not to wish a schematic publish nor do I want to do battle with >> their attorneys as others have. I would just like to talk to someone in >> their customer relations department. I have the box working but without >> their support. >> >> >> >> Herb, KV4FZ >> >> >> ----- >> No virus found in this message. >> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >> Version: 10.0.1424 / Virus Database: 2425/5018 - Release Date: 05/23/12 >> > > _______________________________________________ > UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK > _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK