From:

Roger D Johnson <n...@roadrunner.com>

> I believe 1900 to 2000 kHz is shared with radiolocation in the US also.

> I'm just thankful it's not on 1815!!

> 73, Roger


That's correct. But the FCC has proposed to discontinue the radiolocation 
allocation in that frequency range, and return the entire band to amateurs as 
primary users, in an omnibus NPRM released two years ago. They said that at the 
time, there were no current licensees for 160m radiolocation in the FCC data 
base. Apparently, GPS has pretty well rendered MW roadiolocation obsolete, and 
use of the service is all but discontinued. Back in the 1980s and 90s there 
were a number of beacons operating in our band, and radiolocation interests 
expressed the intent to keep on expanding the service and threatened to 
eventually push us out, since the amateur allocation that part of the band is 
only on a secondary basis. The frequencies between the AMBC band and 160m used 
to be packed solid with beacons; now they are all gone and that spectrum is 
devoid of signals, and beacons are no longer heard in our band except for a few 
weak unlicensed fishnet buoys that can be heard sending out weak 
 CW signals. Even those are of questionable legal status.

At the time, the amateur community didn't pay much attention to the proposal, 
which was announced on the ARRL website. Most hams seemed to think it was much 
ado about nothing, since there weren't any radiolocation beacons left in our 
band anyway.

I said back then that we should have flooded tthe FCC with comments in favour, 
since as long as we remain in secondary status, some new technology could come 
along any day and seek to operate in the top half of the band under the guise 
of "radiolocation". Apparently this is exactly the case with the Canadian radar 
system. Let's hope this radar system doesn't gain favour in the USA.

Even if they aren't operating in the vicinity of 1815, this would be a dire 
threat to users in this part of the band, if hams are ever displaced from the 
top end. Activity now in the top end would have to be re-accommodated somewhere 
below 1900, greatly increasing congestion all the way down to 1800, hampering 
CW operation as well as weak-signal reception in the so-called "DX window".

Don k4kyv


                                          
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

Reply via email to