Andy, > But that is not a pure radio QSO.... If he has local noise they need to > figure out a way to hear on site.
You were not confused with that thought. It was crystal clear thinking regarding what constitutes a valid two way QSO between two station locations without other communication methods involved. It's going to be 70 degrees today. Be the ball, Andy :-) 73...Stan, K5GO Sent from my iPad > On Mar 17, 2015, at 9:27 AM, Andy Blank <andyn...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Guys, please keep up this discussion. > I am reading all the comments, and it helps to hear what people are > thinking. > I won't make any personal comments until after I digest it all. > > I will tell one little story about last night. > Although I am not really a DXer, I happened upon the E30 on 1811 with a > very strong signal. > There was a huge pileup of USA calling, including me. > He worked just a couple of EU stations, and no USA that I could tell. > It occurred to me he should just dial into to a Web SDR and listen. > But that is not a pure radio QSO.... If he has local noise they need to > figure out a way to hear on site. Or maybe not... I am so confused. > > 73, Andy N2NT > > >> On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 11:40 PM, Kris Mraz <n5kilom...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> CQWW used to have the Xtreme category that allowed/encouraged remote >> internet stations. >> Seems like that's the place for those who want to use remote >> receivers. I haven't kept up with >> that category but I believe it was dropped in 2013. >> >> Kris, N5KM >> _________________ >> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband > _________________ > Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
