Thanks to all who replied with suggestions and information! Tim Duffy K3LR responded on behalf of DX Engineering, and offered to have our 4-square amplifiers checked-out and calibrated to match within +/- 0.1 dB. They are also going to look at the DXE-RFS controller to assure that it is functioning correctly to switch the delay lines and antenna feeds when commanded. All this at no cost to us, including shipping!
Thanks to Tim and to DX Engineering for this fantastic response! We've been using the DXE 4-Square RX antenna system at PJ2T since 2006. When operating on 160 and 80-meters from just 12 degrees North of the Equator, receiving antennas that work are very important. The DX Engineering antenna has been an important resource in some very successful PJ2T CQWW CW and CQWW 160 CW Contest operations, including four consecutive 1st Worldwide finishes in the CQWW 160 CW Contest. Thanks again, Tim K3LR! 73, Jeff K8ND From: Jeff Maass K8ND [mailto:jma...@k8nd.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2015 9:17 PM To: 'cq-cont...@contesting.com' <cq-cont...@contesting.com <mailto:cq-cont...@contesting.com> > Cc: 'Jim Galm (j...@w8wts.com <mailto:j...@w8wts.com> )' <j...@w8wts.com <mailto:j...@w8wts.com> > Subject: DX Engineering 4-Square RX Antenna: Element Amplifiers? In January, Jim W8WTS and I were at PJ2T for CQWW 160 CW, and we both noted that our DX Engineering 4-square RX antenna did not appear to perform as well as usual. It is a 98-foot configuration using 102-inch whips. It is set up "field day style" for contests when we use it (i.e. not set up permanently), and so we thought that perhaps all the handling over the years might have caused problems with the feed and delay cables. We had a Array Solutions AIM-4170C VNA with us, and confirmed that all the cables were still in good shape and were of the correct lengths. We decided to bring home the four DXE ARAV3 active antenna amplifiers to diagnose at home (we left the four whips on Curacao!). W8WTS has an Array Solutions VNA-2180 2-port device, and captured curves for inputs and outputs. His analysis is shown below. Screen captures of the resulting curves are in an archive at: http://www.k8nd.com/Radio/PJ2T_DXE_4-Square_amps_ photos.zip <http://www.k8nd.com/Radio/PJ2T_DXE_4-Square_amps_%20photos.zip> . "Each amp has a port a sweep and a port b sweep. There is also a reference pair of sweeps with the amplifier jumpered out of the circuit, to verify that the ports are calibrated correctly. The port a sweep shows the impedance looking into the antenna port. We want the input impedance to be extremely high; higher is better. There is a peak in the Z because of the parallel LC filter on the input of the AVA-2 that rejects out of band signals. You can see that they are all set correctly to peak on 1.8 Mhz. "The port b sweep shows the magnitude and angle of S21. S21 is the forward voltage gain of the amplifier. We want the forward voltage gain to be exactly 1, which is shown on the graphs as 0 dB. The four amplifiers have different gains at 1.8 MHz, but they are very close. The lowest is amp 1 at 1.2 dB and the highest is amp 4 at 1.4 dB. A gain difference of 0.2 dB is very small, but it might make a difference. " They appear to be working OK, but what we don't know is: QUERY: How much of a gain discrepancy is tolerable in the element amplifiers in a DXE four square? 73, Jeff K8ND _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband